The Republicans have not retreated one inch from their
main political thrust – namely “Attack Obamacare”. In fact the GOP is bereft of
any positive initiative. Following upon an Obamacare 24 billion dollar closing
down of the Government and nearly wrecking the Country’s credit rating they
have now launched, a full pressure attack on the “disaster” that was the launch
of Obamacare. With impressive false indignation, in endless congressional hearings,
they are berating all and sundry, from technicians to the Health Care
Secretary, and of course Obama, for the Administration’s failure to put into
place the very project that they have spent 5 years trying to kill. (Blogs:
Obamacare and Obamascare explained, September 28, 2013 and Obamacare:
Hypocrisy. Lies and Facts, October 24, 2013).
The GOP obviously must
believe that this is a winning strategy.
TWIN STATEGIES OF OBAMARE AND
VOTER SUPPRESION
Perhaps it is a bit unfair to
say the Republicans were doing nothing else. They were very busy on what has
been interpreted as voter suppression legislation in State legislatures that
they control. It is
incontrovertible that this legislation will make it more difficult to vote in
elections. The poor, the minorities, the elderly and the full time students,
who just also happen to be predominantly Democratic, will be impacted
disproportionately.
The one advantage of the twin
strategies of attack Obamacare and make it difficult for Democrats to vote, is
that they are about the only issues that the Republican and the insurgent Tea
Party agree on. Also the stumbles on the Obamacare launch and the Republican
successful campaign of terrifying the electorate, that Obamacare will take away
their health insurance has helped reinforce the Republicans’ denial that they
can ignore all else So let Obama bleat about a comprehensive immigration bill
and exhort a bipartisan consensus on the budget and debt ceiling they will not
be sidetracked. Let Harry Reid focus on the civil rights of the LGBT and women
but the Republicans are going to stick to scaring on Obamacare.
WELL ARE THE STRATEGIES
WORKING?
At the moment what metrics
can be used to measure the Republican tactics? Obama and his plan have a 40%
acceptance rate. This could be encouraging to the GOP but that is where they
have been throughout. The Republican approval rate is at 22% and that has
decidedly dropped during the process. What encourages apparently are the daily
reports of some insurance companies dropping their current plans and leaving
patients to find new insurance. This scenario strikes fear into the hearts of
any American since prior to Obamacare they need not have been accepted in any
other plan, Sooner or later those “dropped” are going to find out that they now
have to be accepted by law so this tactic will backfire.
Bur the Republicans still
have to believe that this strategy is going to bring electoral success. So they
soldier on although all the polls show that there has been a major shift to the
Democrats bringing the seemingly impregnable Republican House of
Representatives into play in 2014. In addition the Republican advantage in the
Senate, as a result of the distribution of the midterm Senate races, according
to the polls no longer is evident.
RECENT ELECTIONS
New Jersey – Booker and Chrisite
Well polls are polls but it’s
the elections that count and there have only been a few of those of any
national significance. The first resulted in the overwhelming victory, in the
New Jersey Senate race by Democrat Corrie Booker. But Booker replaced a former
Democratic Senator. Still this result can hardly been encouraging, as one would
have for some movement towards the GOP if their strategy was working.
Also New Jersey Republican
Governor Chris Christie was fearful enough to schedule the Senate election
months ahead of his gubernatorial election lest the Democratic turn out for
Booker would compromise him. So
Christie spent $25,000,000 of New Jersey’s money to hold his election on a
different day to Booker.
That decision speaks volumes
because Christie is the only Republican with any general appeal yet he was
fearful of the Democratic base that would come out to vote for Booker and
against him in the gubernatorial race. The Democrats took a tactical decision
to give Christie a pass. Let him stick around and heighten the rift between the
two wings of the GOP
Christie overwhelmingly won
with bipartisan support and officially stamped himself as the Republican
Establishment Candidate for 2016. However his veto on increasing the minimum
wage in New Jersey was soundly beaten in a referendum. He also had to back down
on his opposition to same sex marriage. So Christie is ultimately is betwixt
and between and that is where the Democrats want him.
Virginia State Elections
Virginia would have to be the
acid test of what the Republicans are gaining by this strategy. If the
Republicans are serious of winning a national election they have to win States
like Virginia. Three positions were contested in Virginia – Governor,
Lieutenant Governor and Attorney General. The Republicans currently held all of
these positions. Much was at stake here. Not the least the fate of Obamacare at
a state level. The outgoing Republican Governor had not accepted Federally
funded Medicaid extension to the poor nor had he set up a State exchange for
its citizens to enlist in Obamacare.
The Republican candidates’ central slogan was that a vote for
the Democrats was a vote for Obamacare. Thus it could not be argued that all
politics are “local” when the Republican slate is vowing to continue, on the
State level, the national Republican do or die position on Obamacare. Also the
Democrat slate had plenty of other issues to talk about such as immigration,
women’s rights, government shutdowns and bipartainship and the like.
In truth this election was a
mirror image of the national debate and the rhetoric used by both sides. The
high profile politicians that found their way to support the various candidates
reinforced the importance of Virginia.
Candidates in Virginia
The Democratic gubernatorial
candidate, Terry McCaulliff, collected tons of money and had Bill Clinton,
Obama and Biden in toe. However, McCauliffe was extremely disliked in Virginia
with a disapproval rating well above his approval rating. The Republicans had a
Tea Party candidate, Ken Cuccinelli, who had Ted Cruz, Sarah Palin, Marc Rubio
and Rand Paul in attendance. (No
Bush’s or Christie’s were in evidence).
If the differences between
the gubernatorial candidates were stark they reached Saturday Night Live
proportions in the Lieutenant Governor’s race. Republican E. W. Jackson
believes inter alia that Obama’s Christianity is laughable, gays are perverted
and non-Christians are “engaged in some sort of false religion”. Democrat Northam
just stuck to the moderate bipartainship mantra of Obama so as to get “things
done”.
The Republican in the race
for the Attorney General’s office was Scott Obenshain. He had a “positive
message” and family connections and plenty of money. He received support from
Republicans who had crossed over the floor to support McCauliff according to
the Washington Post. Obenshain was “realistic” and the guy that the Republicans
hoped to salvage some credibility on - the establishment Republican that is.
Taking all factors into
account the Republicans have naught for their comfort. McCauliffe delivered,
Jackson was slaughtered and Obenshain scraped in by 500 votes and that election
will be subject to a recount.
WOMAN VOTER SUPPRESSION
However, there was one fascinating
piece of demographic data in the Virginian races. The democrats were ahead in
all the demographics expected excepting for women and women’s issues vote where
the point spread was higher than expected, especially among the unmarried. (The
outgoing Virginian Republican Governor had backed a compulsory intravaginal
ultrasound probe, in every case of abortion, regardless of the circumstances).
The perception that the Republicans pay lip service to women’s rights is
obviously more than just a perception.
Besides the usual issues of
women’s health concerns, contraception and abortion another discriminatory
problem cropped up - at the time of the election a major scandal relating to
women voter suppression broke out in Texas.
The Texas legislature passed
a voter suppression law. Essentially you now must have a governmental
identification to vote. In addition that voter identity must correspond to the
exact name you have on the Voter’s role. Now women as they get married and
divorced have more differences on their documents than other demographic. Also
women tend to alternate between using their maiden names as their middle or
their last names. In two well-publicized incidents, a Judge and the Democratic
candidate for Texas Governor were not allowed to cast ballots in a local
election. Fully one third of women voters in Texas face this problem. Thus far
the Republicans have been mum on this issue. They obviously believe that their
voter suppression legislation is their only hope regardless of these unintended
consequences.
If Virginia is anything to go
by the female vote is going to become more and central in defining the future
of the political landscape.
AT THE END OF THE DAY
The Republicans seem too
far-gone to back off now even though their strategy is obviously not working.
They are relying on their Hail Mary pass and just hoping against hope that
Obamacare collapses by its own weight. So Obama better see to it that he does
not snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. A concerted campaigning effort is
on the way by Obama to educate on the obvious advantages of Obamacare, but all
that will come to naught if the website does not work. If the website works are
the Republicans ready for the backlash?
What is their plan B?
Also women’s rights are front
and central and played a big part in the Virginia elections. The latter issue
gets scant attention from the Republicans and Jay H. Ell believes this is going
to become more and more central to the political debate.
Just one final thought and
you heard it first here. Texas has added women to their list of those
discriminated against. Texas has the highest percentage of uninsured, in the
USA - 24%. Nearly 40% of Texans are Latinos and of those nearly 40% have no
medical insurance.
No comments:
Post a Comment