The CEO of the United States Anti - Doping Agency, (USADA),
Travia Tygart, in an interview on Sixty Minutes on January 27, 2012, stated
that Armstrong lied in the recent Oprah - Armstrong interview. In that Oprah
interview Armstrong supposedly told all and confessed to his all his “sins”.
Predictably Armstrong refused the USADA offer to testify under oath by February
20, 2012. Armstrong now faces a
life long ban in every sport. This is the latest chapter in an ongoing saga that
has lasted 15 years. Armstrong responded to the USADA offer by beginning to put
himself in the victim role.
Tygart’s allegations and ultimatum makes one wonder, yet
again, what was the point of the Lance – Oprah “confessional”.
THE MYTHTAKE
Lance Armstrong was an icon, a beacon, a giant and the most
remarkable sportsman of the past two decades. He also elevated a little known sport, cycling, into the
subject of daily discussion and a whole channel was devoted to watching The
Tour de France - the equivalent in cycling of the Super bowl in American
Football, The World Cup in Soccer, Wimbledon in Tennis, The Masters in Golf.
Except who cared about cycling till Lance came along.
The Tour De France is a spectacle over 23 days. It is also
considered sports most demanding test of stamina with a route that varies, but
essentially traverses the whole of France. It includes passages over two
mountain chains, the Pyrenees and the Alps. The experience is considered the
equivalent of climbing the highest mountains. The winner usually is the rider
who performs best in the mountain stages and here “our man” Lance always came
out tops. Believe it or not cycling is a team sport. Each team consists of 9
riders. The latter ride according to a plan whose objective is to see to it
that their man, i.e. Lance, has the most favorable chance of winning.
Lance won The Tour for seven consecutive years between 1999
and 2005. These feats being achieved after having being diagnosed and treated
for testicular cancer with metastases in the brain and lung in 1996.The
successful treatment included chemotherapy as well as surgery to the brain.
Armstrong then started his own Cancer Foundation that has grown and grown. His
Foundation has literally raised hundreds of millions of dollars. Armstrong also
has actively encouraged other celebrities to be involved in charitable causes.
All this is the stuff that legends are made of.
So where did it all go wrong?
ALLEGATIONS AND INVESTIGATIONS OF DOPING UP TO 2009
Allegations of doping have dogged Armstrong from the
beginning of his career. The first accusation in 1995 and then followed the first major documented
expose that was published in a book, “La Confidential- Les secrets de Lance
Armstrong”. Excerpts were published in the UK Sunday Times. Armstrong responded
aggressively as he had done previously - with righteous indignation, denials,
smears and litigation. The court ruled in Armstrong favor and apologies and
damages followed. This was a pattern that would follow again and again. He
would successfully sue close associates, colleagues and employees, who under
oath revealed his doping and the organization of large scale doping of his team
members. Where there were positive doping tests, as there was in 2005 his
successful legal challenges won the day. Where there were accusations of
bribery these were vigorously denied. He donated $100,000 to the International
Cycling Agency, who graciously accepted and who allegedly was covering up for
him. He also attempted to donate $100,000 to USADA who unceremoniously refused the
“donation” and who ultimately nailed him.
Armstrong intimidated those who testified against him and
threatened them with elimination from the sport, according to the USADA report.
The CEO of USADA maintained that he, personally, had been threatened with
death.
The initial USADA report gave graphic first person details
of the doping and Lance’s organization of doping the whole team. Those that
resisted were axed from the team. His fellow cyclists were terrified of him as
he controlled the whole show. If you crossed him that was the end of your
cycling career.
However, up to 2012 a defiant Armstrong extracted apologies
and money from those who accused him. He unashamedly humiliated and even sued
his closest associates whether they were team members or masseuses.
USADA INVESTGATION AND FINDINGS 2011 - 2012
However evidence was beginning to become overwhelming. A
2010 to 2012 Federal Criminal investigation was surprisingly dropped with no
charges. Armstrong was not as fortunate with a United States Anti–Doping
Agency, (USADA), who started their investigation in 2011. The USADA
investigated allegations from 1995.
Armstrong did all in his power to get the Courts to
intervene to stop the USDA but to no avail. He labeled the charges “heinous and
outlandish. He continued,” There comes a point in every man's life when he has
to say, 'Enough is enough.'" He would not appeal anything. Everyone knew
that this was a witch-hunt. Everyone knew that he won his races fair and
square”.
But the USADA findings, were far reaching, unequivocal and
copiously documented. Several of his teammates and other cyclists also gave
sworn testimony against him. All other cycling and athletic bodies stripped him
of his titles. He was unable to ever compete again in anything. Defiant to the
end he appeared in photographs with 9 Tour de France yellow jerseys in the
background.
The USADA placed bans on others also involved in what they
categorized as, “The most sophisticated, professionalized and successful doping
program that sport had ever seen”. The doping of the US Postal Team was
subsidized by millions of taxpayer dollars.
OPRAH INTERVIEW – WHY?
And along came Oprah. All of a sudden he would ‘fess up
after his lawyer had called the USADA investigation a “hatchet job”. Why
Armstrong would confess the Lord and he only knew and not necessarily in that
order. His lawyers would have told him to shut up. He stood on the cusp of
endless civil and possible criminal charges. But Jay H. Ell’s guess is that
Armstrong is a man who doesn’t listen to too many people.
So “confess”, after a fashion, he did but the old arrogance,
the old coldness, the old callousness and indifference were still there. There
was no remorse. He could not remember how many people he sued, how many lives
he had wrecked. He admitted he was a bully. He was a serial liar… There was
often an incongruent smirk on his face as he replied to Oprah.
There was one piece of evidence in mitigation. Doping was
the culture at the time and he had evened the playing field. He almost negated
his only exculpatory evidence by saying he would not have won all those jerseys
without all that systematic doping.
THE POINT OF ALL?
So what purpose did this “confession” serve?
Well there was plenty in it for Oprah and her failing
network. She was her usual polished self and reminded one why she was able to
dominate the talk show circuit for all those years. Her interview was seen by
well over 30 million worldwide.
The victims could have gained some vindication from their
experience of crossing this colossus. The devastation that he had caused and
the years of misery that had resulted could not really be compensated but this
was far better than nothing.
The cycling and athletic bodies as well as the anti doping
bodies would get a chance to clean up their acts. Maybe they will create some
type of level playing field.
Society gained plenty in that, however, powerful one might
be, and on the odd occasion there is accountability and exposure. Jay H. Ell
would like to believe that the explosive information revolution especially in
the form of the Internet makes it harder to escape the glare of the cold reality
and truth.
BUT LANCE?
But there was naught for Lance’s comfort even if he did not
have the insight to realize it. His sociopathic behavior was there for all to see. He should
have got the message in 1995 when he first got away with it. However, consistent
with sociopathic behavior he did not learn from the past. He carried on and on.
Omnipotent from the word go maybe he feels, that now that he
has told everyone what he or she already knew, he could start again. This giant
ego believes he can conquer new fields and bowl everybody over again.
However, he has not really got past the first step of the
equivalent of Alcoholic Anonymous. Lance has got a long, long way to go. But
notwithstanding the circumstances of his confession it is certainly better than
nothing or his endless denials and destruction of others.
Most importantly for Lance is that the USADA are singularly
unimpressed with his performance on the Oprah show. They believe it just adds
to his ongoing charade of deceit and lies.
So rather than bring closure Lance has merely added to his
indictment sheet and kept the momentum going to expose and litigate against
him. There was no way that he would have appeared before the USADA, under oath,
with that volume of testimony against him. He must wish that he had given Oprah
a miss and rather faded away. But that would not be consistent with the
sociopathic behavior that got him to this mess to start with. One wonders where
all this will end. The civil litigation and Whistleblowers’ actions will keep
Lance in the news forever. Jay H. Ell believes that Lance has chosen a path
that will not allow for redemption. His end is the same of O. J, Simpson’s –
lifelong ignominy.
Hopefully what has happened to Lance will deter others, who,
whatever their evil inclinations are, must realize they still have choice.
Jay H. Ell knows that that is a fat hope but if it deters just one person then
the effort of exposing him will have been worth it.
At least Lance’s Cancer Foundation is continuing – even
without him.
No comments:
Post a Comment