The world, particularly the Catholic world, has been jolted
by the unexpected resignation of Pope Benedict XV1. Popes just don’t resign, as
we have been told ad nauseam – the last one being Pope Gregory in the 14
hundreds. The latter resigned at a time of great upheaval in the Church known
as the Great Schism where two contenders were claiming the papacy.
Pope Benedict did nothing to lessen the gravitas of his
decision. He stated that he was communicating a matter of, “… great importance
to the church.” He then stated that he was doing so as “his strengths were no
longer suited to an adequate exercise of the Petrine Ministry.” He also was,
“well aware of the seriousness of this act”. The context of the resignation was
“… today's world, (was), subject to so many rapid changes and shaken by
questions of deep relevance for the life of faith”.
So it is fair to paraphrase that this resignation was of
tremendous significance at a time that some have said that the church was in
“crisis” or at least at a “crossroad”.
It is also fair to say that the Catholic Church is one of
the most important institutions in the world. One in 6 people are Catholics –
that is approximately 1.2 billion people. The Church itself is tremendously
wealthy and influential. It is
almost trite to say that the Church exhibits an all-embracing influence at the
grass roots level, not only on personal behavior, but also in social and
community activities such as charity and hospitals and even politically in
various countries. The Church is potentially the most important agent for
change in the world.
WHAT ARE THE “RAPID CHANGES” AND WHAT QUESTIONS HAVE “SHAKEN
THE FAITH”?
The issues and challenges that that the papacy is facing in
the future and those the outgoing Pope faced are many.
Pope Benedict XV1 was extremely unfortunate to be caught
slap bang in the middle of resolving the festering problem of sexual abuse and
its cover up in the Church. He worked hard at healing the havoc it wreaked. But
like everything too late the efforts were considered too little and the issue
is still lingering on.
“When forced to, he talks about
the crimes but ignores the cover-ups, uses the past tense as if to suggest it's
not still happening," maintained David Clohessy, the executive director of
the Survivors Network of Those Abused by Priests. "He has vast powers and
he's done very little to make a difference." Others however have
appreciated his efforts particularly in meeting with some of the victims.
Then there was the failure to
resolve the ever-present banking scandals that the Vatican has been faced with
over decades. The Vatican Bank is currently being investigated by the European
bank for not having enough safeguards against money laundering. In addition his
own butler was convicted in stealing confidential documents.
But the social issues
challenging church doctrine have to be the most threatening of the “rapid
changes” and the most "relevant" that are” shaking….. the life of the
faith”.
SOCIAL PROBLEMS
There are the social “problems” that his successor will
inherit that have been exacerbated by a “changing” world. These include
contraception, abortion, homosexuality, feminism and even masturbation.
Societal opinion is moving more and more in the opposite direction of the
Church’s teaching in these areas.
Besides these general social
issues there are those directly facing the church, such as communion and
remarriage for the divorced. Ordination of women into the priesthood is also a
hot button issue that is becoming more and more prominent. Celibacy of the
priesthood is an age-old controversy that will never die. There is support
within the church to allow men with AIDS to use condoms to prevent its spread.
There is an incredible shortage
of nuns and priests that many maintain are related directly or indirectly to
the social issues. In 1970 there were 420, 000 priests and while the number of
Catholics grew to 1.2 billion in 2010, a growth of 83% in 40 years, the number
of priests declined to 412,000. (Figures from CARA Georgetown University).
TURMOIL IN US CHURCH
While Europe has become more and
more secular and has just quietly voted with it’s feet, the USA has been a
hotbed of revolt. Catholicism is the largest religion in the United States
where 25%, (80,000,000) of the population is Catholic. Most of the fuss
and publicity with the church itself has been related to the sex abuse scandals
where to date there have been 6,100 accused priests, 16,000 victims and 3
billion dollars paid out in sex abuse claims. In fact the whole subject will
not go away. The Washington Post in an editorial as recently as February 14
complained that the “disgraced” Cardinal Mahoney, who was deeply involved in
the cover up of abusers, is entitled to vote for the next Pope.
Contraception is not even an
issue with Catholic women and 98% of them have used the latter at one or other
stage of their lives.
With the high percentage of
Catholics in the USA it is inevitable that several are in prominent political
positions where their stance on social issues is of public interest such as gay
marriage, gays in the military and in scouts, abortion, contraception and
feminism generally, is in the public arena. It is accepted that the majority of
the electorate, that includes those of catholic persuasion, to a lesser or
greater extent are in not in favor of the current church doctrines on these
issues.
The most public display of
opposition to the status quo to the Church has come from the Leadership
Conference of Women Religions. This group has 80% of the 57,000 nuns in the US
as members. They have been outspoken on social issues and believe that women
should be in all ministries. The Group has been roundly criticized by the
Vatican as being more focused on social justice than the church doctrines. They
are now to be supervised by three bishops. A particular target has been Sister
Margaret Farley who has written a book entitled “Just Love”. It includes
discussion on homosexuality, feminism and masturbation.
LIKELYHOOD OF DOCTRINAL CHANGE
The hype surrounding this
resignation would lead one to believe that the Church could go either way on
adapting to the “rapid changes”. Examination of the facts however rate the
chances slim to none that there will be any major shift in doctrinal
policy. The reasons for this are
many and include:
* “Smaller and Cohesive Church”.
Pope Benedict has stated his preference for a “smaller and
cohesive Church”. Implicit is his belief that the church will not change to
become more inclusive of those who support this “rapid change”. Even more significantly he appointed 67
of the 118 Cardinals. Between Pope Benedict and his very close associate Pope
John Paul 11 they have appointed nearly every Cardinal in the conclave. Some have
suggested that the Pontiff took this momentous decision to be a presence when
the next Holy See was chosen. Although he is forbidden to be involved in the
process there is no doubt that his very existence must have an influence on the outcome. In support of this theory is his statement the next day that his
decision was,”….. for the benefit
of the church”.
* Candidates for the Next Holy
See
Ostensibly the nationality of
the next Pope will be a pointer as to whether the Church might respond to
societal pressures of many of its flock. Intuitively one might believe that an
African or Latin American Pontiff candidate or at least a non-Italian or
non-European candidate might be a pointer to change. Examination of the leading
candidates’ positions, regardless of their country of origin, however, will
show that their philosophies are virtually ad idem.
The leading candidate is
Cardinal Peter Turksen of Ghana. He has a prestigious position in having been
appointed President of the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace. He, is, if
anyone is, the “progressive” candidate. However his credentials for this honor
are pretty thin. He has half supported the idea that husbands with AIDS use
condoms so as not to infect their spouses and that is that. The other African
candidate with a chance is Cardinal Francis Arize of Nigeria who is the eldest
of the candidates, barely qualifying for the Conclave. He is extremely
conservative epitomizing the Church’s attitude on homosexuality. He might be a
long shot as a compromise candidate as a result of his age.
There are two possible Latin
American candidates. Cardinals De Aviz of Brazil and Leonardo Sadri of
Argentine. Latin America has 42% of the Catholics in the world. Recently the
Church in South America has been challenged in their proselytizing by other
religions including Anglicans. Both of these candidates are within the
conservative mould.
The Italians and Europeans
Cardinals have as their strongest candidate the Milanese Cardinal Scala. He
represents the traditional line. Europe has now only 25% of the world Catholic
population. Many of these are nominally Catholics and it is acknowledged that
the Church is out of sync with their needs and opinions.
The New York Times report that
the Canadian Cardinal Quelet is the favorite of Pope Benedict XV1. He believes
that Vatican 11 was interpreted too liberally. He heads the extremely powerful
position of the Pope’s Office of Bishops. He thus appoints all the Bishops
throughout the world of 1,2 billion Catholics. He is relatively young not yet being
70 years. In Jay H Ell’s opinion he has to be the favorite. He also fits the
bill as not being Italian or European and this gives the impression that the
Church is becoming more inclusive.
There are several other long
shots such as Cardinal Dolan of the USA but that is what they are – long
shots. The one characteristic, all
those that are serious contenders have, is that they are not going to change
the status quo.
* National Origins of the
Cardinals.
In the 8 years that Pope
Benedict XV1, and in the 27 years of his predecessor’s reign for that matter,
no real attempts has been made to meaningfully increase the Cardinal
representation to approximate the number of Catholics in each respective
country or continent. Italy with 53 million Catholics has 28 Cardinals, South
America with 492 million have 19 Cardinals and Europe including Italy with a
total of 300, 000 million have 64 Cardinals. So it is hard to imagine any
candidate for the Papacy not needing a big chunk of the Conservative European
Cardinal vote.
*The Vatican Bureaucracy.
The Vatican has a labyrinthine
bureaucracy that is crucial to the working of the Church and the Papacy. Most
of the major contenders have knowledge and have worked with it making an
“outsider’s” election and ability to change the culture that much more
difficult.
CONCLUSION
Everything thus points to the
election of a Conservative candidate who wishes to maintain the status quo in
the Catholic Church. Whatever the reason for Pope Benedict’s historic decision
his very presence increases this possibility. The impact on the world will be
felt whatever the decision because, regardless of the Church doctrine, the
Church has a long tradition of serving the poor and pursuing justice. The big
struggle for the hearts and minds of souls will be in Africa where Muslims are
making inroads.
Rightly or wrongly the Vatican
are concentrating on doctrine rather than meeting the needs of the modern
world. They are ignoring the words of the nuns in the USA for example.
Communities have literally had to abandon parishes, as they are not recruiting
Priests. They have not recruited any more priests to account for a growth of
nearly double the Catholics between 1970 and 2010. The average age of the
priests in 1970 was 35 and in 2010 it was 63 years old. All this points to inability to recruit those who articulate church doctrine and those whom they
need to serve the communities. The situation is potentially explosive. What
happens if all those nuns will not listen to the three male supervising Bishops
will nearly all the nuns in the USA be excommunicated?
Where it will all end no one
knows but there are several possibilities including breakaway churches. In this
day and age, to quote Pope Benedict XV1, of “rapid change”, coupled with the
tools for continuous communication that has provided empowerment to the masses,
anything can happen.
No comments:
Post a Comment