As predicted in the last blog, (ISRAEL: WINNERS AND LOSERS),
Netanyahu was in danger of getting on the wrong side of history. Abbas has been
ignored by Israel in spite of his overtures and policing the West Bank. The inevitable happened and the UNO
voted Abbas’s Palestinian movement Nation status and Observer status at that
body. Palestine is no longer hanging around waiting for Godot. They don’t need
Israel if they have world support for their Statehood. Israel has lost what
could have been a bargaining point in negotiations. The vote was overwhelming
with a few against and a number of abstentions. The reality is that world
opinion, including that of Israel’s natural allies, is that Israel is not
fulfilling its expectations in negotiating with Abbas’s Fatah who have, in
their opinion, got weaker as a result of Israel not rewarding his stance. The
same Western allies that were fore square behind Israel in Hamas’s attack
somehow did not understand this time round.
Netanyahu’s response to the UNO decision was to "punish" Abbas for going to the UNO by announcing permits for new Settlements that if put into place would never
allow Palestine to be an integral state. Just in case anyone had second
thoughts, that they should have waited one more year to give Netanyahu an
opportunity to make overtures, Netanyahu dispelled any lingering doubts by his
intemperate reaction,
On the other hand Abbas, to quote the New York Times, “Made
a rare but symbolic gesture to Israel saying that he had no claim on the town
that he was driven from in the 1948 war of the Jewish nation’s founding”. Thus
reassuring all those that had voted for Palestinian Statehood that he was
serious about peace.
WHAT THIS DOESN’T MEAN.
- That
nobody understands what Israel has to do to maintain its security.
- That
this was part of the new wave of anti-Semitism. (Although Jay H. Ell is
sure that there were some anti Semitic states among those voting.)
- That
the international body does not appreciate that Israel accepted the
Balfour Declaration of 1917 and the UNO declaration of a two State
solution to Palestine in 1947 only to be met by war after war.
- That
everyone has forgotten about the Holocaust.
- That
the world is unaware that Iran is the real problem that threatens Israel’s
very existence and the world’s peace generally.
- That
nobody knows that Hamas and a large number of Arab and Muslim states do
not even recognize Israel’s existence
- That
all are unaware that the Palestinians have not been cynically used over
decades as a weapon to illegitmize Israel
- That
those voting for the Palestinian status necessarily disagree with Israel’s
perception that the Palestinians have rebuffed every offer at a two State
Solution including the Barak and Olmert efforts in the last decade
- That
this is part of the ongoing 3 millennium persecution of Jews
- That
the international community are unaware that the Palestinian children are
used as human shields and taught at school to hate Israel and the Jews
- That
Hamas has randomly been shelling Israel for years on end
- That
all are unaware that Abbas, like so many politicians, talks out of two
sides of his mouth
- That
the State of Israel is not a democracy in a sea of totalitarianism
- That
the Goldstone report was balanced.
- That
there are not double standards. Nobody said anything when all the Arab
countries expelled all their Jews and where were the unanimous resolutions
condemning the Soviets for the treatment of Soviet Jewry and the
condemnation now at the outbreaks of the "new" anti-Semitism?
- That
there is any meaningful International law on Israel’s situation.
- And on
and on…..
WHAT IT DOES MEAN.
- That
the world has come around to the opinion that the Palestinians are
endlessly suffering and that they empathize with their lot.
- That
they believe that Israel is doing nothing to assist Abbas, who lost a
tremendous amount of influence by policing the West Bank and asking for
peace.
- That
they feel Israel are exacerbating the situation by ignoring Abbas who has
said that he believes that Palestine should have accepted the two state
solution as far back as 1947.
- That
Israel is stifling any hope of economic independence of that country by
their de facto occupation and keeping the Palestinians in servitude.
- That
if Israel maintains that they are more democratic, and by implication more
civilized than the surrounding countries, they should be judged by the
standards they claim to maintain.
- That
Abbas is in now in a position to charge Israel with war crimes.
- That
the world believes that Israel are at least part of the problem
- That
those believe that Netanyahu is nothing but a militarist, who has no
intention other than to solve this problem by violence, may have a point
- And on
and on……..
ISRAELI OPINION.
This has thrown the whole Palestinian issue back into the
Israeli election arena. There are of course no immediate ways to know how this
turn of events may influence the outcome. However, the right wing coalition of
Netanyahu and Lieberman seem to face no real opposition. In the light of the
Settlement announcement one now understands why Defense Minister Barak, a
moderate, resigned for “family reasons”.
There is a perception that the Israeli electorate is getting
disillusioned by the same old same old. The majority felt pessimistic, prior to
the UNO decision and Netanyahu’s response, at the outcome of the Hamas
interlude, believing a peaceful solution was evading Israel. Implicit in their
pessimism was that Israel was not able to solve this problem militarily. The
majority of Israelis indicated their opposition to a ground war in the Hamas
war. This course of events could not have changed their minds.
Also Obama’s approval rating has gone up to over 60% in
Israel. It is no secret that he
will stand by Israel when it’s security is attacked but that he firmly believes
in a two state solution. Also the animosity between him and Netanyahu is not a secret in Israel. Hillary Clinton reiterated the
Obama Administration’s position on new settlements maintaining that they set
back peace efforts
One can hope somehow the feelings of the majority are
somehow reflected in the election results.
WHAT NOW?
One would have hoped that Netanyahu, like so many from the
right before him, would be empowered, finally to make a move to sort out this
thorny mess. Morsy the Egyptian President, who has far more credibility than
Mubarak, has no choice really but to help him. There are so many ways he could
lead – by unilaterally easing economic restrictions. He could have given them
more access to water. He could make moves that would not involve political concessions.
What about inviting Abbas just as a guest to his hometown of Safed? What about
a three state solution?
Thinking out of the box Netanyahu could have recognized
Abbas efforts long ago and rewarded it in one way or another. Instead he is
already behind history with the UNO decision.
If the current wisdom is that Abbas is just posturing then
prove it.
Or doesn’t Jay H. Ell understand? We should all prepare for
Armageddon. Israel is the eternal victim with no control over it’s own destiny
and will go down in a blaze of glory at worst or forever be fighting wars that
may just be preventable. Remember by its own secular and biblical value system
they should be behaving differently from the totalitarians and that they should
not harm strangers, as they were strangers in Egypt.
Serendipitously this Saturday’s portion of Jewish law,
(Torah portion), read in the synagogue, was about Jacob’s meeting with Esau. The
lesson being, first you pray for peace then you do anything you can to obtain
it, even bribe, and only if all fails resort to war. Also the portion is said
to underline the fact that there is some good in everyone.
To quote Jonathon Sacks, Chief Rabbi of the United Kingdom,
in his book, The Dignity of Difference,
“Will we endlessly replay the hatreds of the past? Or choose differently this
time for the sake of the world’s children and their future”.
No comments:
Post a Comment